Majorityrights Central > Category: U.S. Politics

GW has expressed the constraint:

“It is a pity that Christianity, as flawed as it is from a European racial perspective, is undeniably part of the unity of north and south.  We are stuck with it, for it has been too close for too long to us - and the faithful must have their faith expressions, after all.”

DanielS has expressed the constraint:

“Adding yet another knot in the tangle is the argument that with the Christian texts already being the terms in which many of our people think, the currency for two thousand years now, there must be some ontological basis beneath, and we may as well find the positive logic to it for our purposes. However, with the texts being what they are, the motivations of the texts being as convoluted, Jewish and ambiguous as they were to begin, all that winds-up happening with the deciphering of our “true” logic behind Christianity is a contribution to the mess.”

An approach offered by John Harland is to admit the historicity of Jesus in His essential mythic image as descendant of God evidenced in his own over-ruling of texts with direct bodily connection with God as Father, but to deny the historicity of the extant texts—deny them as yet another means by which dastards attempt to interpose themselves between the God-heritage of individuals and their Father, in spirit and flesh.

Ridicule of Harland’s own editing of the texts to suit his view may be conducted only at the sacrifice of the two constraints establishing the context of this presentation. Offer a superior approach if you don’t like Harland’s—either that or declare folly the entire effort to connect with the spiritual force of Christianity.

Click this link for a pdf document containing part of Harland’s account starting with “The Germans” (in the anthropological sense meaning what many identify as Celtic and Nordic pagans of the pre-Christian era), “The Catholic Church Promotes Judeo-Christianity”, “The First Breaking Apart of the Church Serpent” (regarding Henry VIII and Martin Luther), “A Further Break From the Serpent” (regarding the establishment of America), “The Strange Phenomenon of ‘Money-Mad’ Americans” (regarding the closing of the frontier and replacement of Nature and Nature’s God with money-based “culture”), “The American Dream” (the commodification, by conspirators, of the American spiritual renaissance), “The German Reich” (the parallel processes occurring in what became the nation state known as “Germany” during the 1800s leading up to WW I), “The World Picture After WW I” (the situation leading up to WW II) and the concluding section of this pdf document is “The Second World War”.

The entire book is “Word Controlled Humans” by John Harland, ISBN 0-914752-12-X available from Sovereign Press, 326 Harris Road, Rochester, WA 98579 (with which I have no business or personal relationship).

I coined the term Pervasive Ecology and hypothesized that it provides a context of the broadest utility that one may take in White advocacy because it may be universalized but not foundationalized.

READ MORE...

Notwithstanding the vast amount of straitening post-election commentary that has appeared across the right-wing media, I thought it might be in order to offer one or two thoughts of my own.  Apologies now to anyone who doesn’t mind if they never read another word about this sorry issue!

As every politically-minded person has surely realised, the impressive block-voting of non-whites has put demographics at the centre of political calculation. The GOP in its current form is already electorally obsolete.  Two-thirds of a static white electorate will never again be sufficient to command an electoral majority.  The one-third of white Americans, particularly single women, voting Democrat were already gestured towards by the GOP’s rejection of Bachman, Cain, Santorum, Gingrich, and the libertarian Constitutionalist Ron Paul.  Romney was supposed a flip-flopper, a RINO, and therefore electable to all those Republican voters lost in 2008.  Now he is the point from which the party has to migrate to find a majority.  It has to reach out to blacks and Hispanics, and it cannot even rely any more on conservative minorities like Alan West.

For mainstream political observers the interesting question is how the GOP will adapt to this new reality and retain its present constituencies.  Nationalists, however, already know that the constant pursuit of conservative movements is not principle but relevance.  Ultimately, it’s about power, and nothing is likely to change this time.  The party managers will take the Christian Right for granted.  After all, where can it go without entirely marginalising itself?  The new party line will say little that is critical of illegal migrants, abortion, or homosexual politics.  It will trumpet a more anti-statist and economically liberal platform.  This, in turn, will redefine the political centre, and narrow the national debate even further, and that will generate a new bout of radicalism on the left.

Now let’s look for a few aspects in this of particular interest to nationalists.

READ MORE...

Four years ago Barack Hussein Obama II was elected to the office of President of the United States of America.  It was something new, and while everybody in White Nationalism saw the “hope” nonsense and the “change” nonsense for what it was, by no means every White Nationalist was unhappy about Obama’s victory.  Some even voted for him.

There was, of course, another, darker, grittier hope of change, born in the belief that, inevitably, white Americans would be pushed closer to, and perhaps even beyond, what they can bear.  The hand of federal government control would grow heavy.  The economy would slump.  The taxes would increase.  The racial injustice would mount.  Everything in the white American life would become worse, and not by a little but a lot.  Anger, frustration and cynicism would take hold.  A search for alternatives beyond the GOP, beyond the prescribed news of the media, would take hold too, and WN’s long hoped-for change in the somnolence of white America would come closer.

Well, we got the Tea Party and Arizona SB 1070, I suppose.  But tomorrow the incumbent is expected by most onlookers to secure his second term.  So what do WNs expect “worse-wise” from that, and how do they assess the viability of the “worse is better” scenario?  Are we seeing any movement at all in the white American thrall to the mainstream?  What, after all, would it look like?  How long would it take to become obvious?  And what, if anything, can be expected to develop in the next four years?

Or 71% of her, anyway.

The Daily Telegraph has launched a VoteMatch application for the candidates in the 2012 Republican primaries (minus John Huntsman for some reason).

Mind you, it might not work.  Telegraph scribbler Tim Stanley took the test:

I’ll be honest and say that the answer I came up with was … Michele Bachmann. I’m surprised because I would have thought my views on foreign policy were unorthodox enough to put me in the Ron Paul camp. But I suspect that the part where I ranked my issues tilted the results towards the Minnesota Congresswoman. This election, it’s the economy, stupid.

For a person of my station, this is a humiliating result. I always did my best to stay a cut above the Middle American conservatives: did a fellowship at Harvard, went skiing in Aspen, made friends with a few of the richer Democrats, even donated a little money to reseed the golf club green. But, despite all this, the Daily Telegraph says that Michele Bachmann and me are ideological bedfellows. It seems this blue blood is a red neck after all.

And this Darwinian is a Creationist!

The trap we carefully left alone was talking about the accepted date, because this was the day the number was stamped on to the application making it into a certificate. If Obama was to have a file number higher than the Nordyke twins, the accepted date would have needed to be either the same day or later than the accepted date of the Nordyke twins. Ooooppppps.

From the current front page of the Birthers.org website, an article titled “Sequential Anomalies or Over My Dead Body”.

This anomaly appears to be the strongest evidence of a White House conspiracy, and the only evidence for which I have not yet seen some explanation, however weak.  The strategy appears to be for the White House to remain disdainfully aloof while the liberal media, even abroad, counters where it can but chiefly pronounces on the sanity of mind of those who persist with their questions.  But it will only take one unanswered and possibly unanswerable question like the one above to corrode what gains this can deliver.  And if that happens, the further entrenchment of opposition to this presidency is inevitable.  There will never be a full and final disclosure.  Congress will never impeach or investigate Obama.  But what odds his surviving to fight for a second-term?

But ... is this scenario good for white America?  What, going forward, would be the optimum operational circumstances for White Nationalism to advance?  An exposed and shamed non-American president and a chastened Establishment?  A resurgent Republican Party, powerfully informed by populist conservative instincts (but likely led by Mitt Romney)?  Really?  The experience of political nationalism in Europe strongly suggests that a second Obama term mired in public distrust and bitterness is a certain generator of division, and division eventually turns to radicalism.

I’m not an American, and I know I miss a lot of the finer points of American political life.  But even I know that one effective opposition, if only a conservative-libertarian opposition, has been grown in Obama’s America.  WNs who aren’t attracted to the gradualism of Hunter and Co should hope to keep the black guy in the White House.  Even if he was born in darkest Mombasa, and never came closer than a snowflake to an Hawaiian maternity ward.

Jim Giles interviewed James Bowery a couple of days ago on Radio Free Mississippi. The primary territory is the conflict between Jewish interests and the Enlightenment values of truth and freedom—conflict as exemplified by the hostility of Jews toward the laboratory of the states to found discourse on experimentation rather than argumentation. It is 1 hour 48 minutes.

A long and winding conversation, as much as an interview, with Alex Linder. One hour seventeen minutes long, in fact. File size 35.2MB.